This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Leathwood, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Critique of Institutional Inequalities in Higher Education

(or an Alternative to Hypocrisy for Higher Educational Policy)

Institute for Policy Studies in Education, London Metropolitan University c.leathwood{at}londonmet.ac.uk

This article seeks to apply Adam Swift’s (2003) critique of private and selective schooling to higher education in the UK. The higher education sector in this country is highly differentiated, with high status, research-led elite institutions at the top of the university hierarchy, and newer universities, with far lower levels of funding and prestige, at the bottom. The extent of this differentiation is illustrated by an analysis of six universities at different ends of this spectrum. It also becomes apparent that the student profiles of these institutions are very different, with privately educated, white, middle class students particularly over-represented in the elite universities, and working-class, minority ethnic, and to some extent, women students concentrated in those institutions with far lower levels of funding and prestige. Considerable benefits accrue to those who have attended the elite institutions, and it is argued that the hierarchy of universities both reflects and perpetuates social inequalities, with the middle-classes retaining their privileges and the elite continuing to reproduce itself. The discourse of meritocracy that is used to justify this institutional differentiation is also discussed, and the paper concludes with a call for a more socially just and equitable future for the higher education sector.

Key Words: equality/inequalities • higher education/universities • meritocracy • social class

Theory and Research in Education, Vol. 2, No. 1, 31-48 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1477878504040576


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Voigt Individual choice and unequal participation in higher education Theory and Research in Education, March 1, 2007; 5(1): 87 - 112. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Swift The morality of school choice reconsidered: A response Theory and Research in Education, November 1, 2004; 2(3): 323 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF]