Theory and Research in Education

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, M.
Right arrow Articles by Muller, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Theory and Research in Education, Vol. 5, No. 2, 173-201 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1477878507077732
© 2007 SAGE Publications

Truth and truthfulness in the sociology of educational knowledge

Michael Young

Institute of Education, University of London, and the Graduate School of Humanities, University of Cape Town, M_Young{at}ioe.ac.uk

Johan Muller

Institute of Education, University of London, and the Graduate School of Humanities, University of Cape Town

The aim of this article is to reflect on and explore questions of truth and objectivity in the sociology of educational knowledge. It begins by reviewing the problems raised by the social constructivist approaches to knowledge associated with the `new sociology of education' of the I970s. It suggests that they have significant parallels with the pragmatist ideas of James and Dewey that Durkheim analysed so perceptively in his lectures on pragmatism. The article then considers Basil Bernstein$quoteright$s development of Durkheim$quoteright$s ideas.We argue that despite his highly original conceptual advances Bernstein seems to accept, at least implicitly, that the natural sciences remain the only model for objective knowledge. This leads us to a discussion of Ernest Cassirer$quoteright$s idea of symbolic forms as a more adequate basis for the sociology of knowledge. In the conclusion, the article suggests how an approach to knowledge in educational studies that draws on Cassirer$quoteright$s idea of$space$quoteleftsymbolic objectivity' can come to terms with the tension between the concept of truth and a commitment to `being truthful' that was left unresolved, even unaddressed, by the $space$quoteleftnew' sociology of education of the I970s.

Key Words: educational knowledge • objectivity • sociology • truth


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
M. Young
From Constructivism to Realism in the Sociology of the Curriculum
Review of Research in Education, February 1, 2008; 32(1): 1 - 28.
[Full Text] [PDF]